|
|
DOSSIER |
|
|
MacGregor electric deck systems prove optimal for bulk carrier operations
“Bulk carrier operators have been deterred from investing in electric systems due to the higher initial outlay,” says Carsten Sietas, Senior MacGregor Executive, Cranes. “That is now changing as owners come to realise the difference in cost between electric and hydraulic cranes isn’t all that great – while the savings enabled by electric solutions in the long run are considerable.”
MacGregor’s electric cranes are highly efficient, Sietas explains, and can cut power consumption by up to 50%, resulting in significant savings in operating expenditure. The systems’ relatively low energy demands reduce fuel consumption by generators – and since alternative fuels are more expensive than oil, electric cranes will become even more valuable in the future. When combined with other factors such as a streamlined installation process, the downsizing of auxiliary generators can partly offset the higher initial cost of electric cranes, minimising CapEx for both the ship owner and yard. Installation of MacRack operating device to MacGregor side-rolling hatch covers at Sungdong shipyard September 2014 According to Sietas, the relatively simple configuration of electric systems can also help to cut OpEx, with one MacGregor case study showing a 22% reduction in service and spare-parts costs – amounting to a saving of up to $75,000 over 15 years. This is because many of the parts in a hydraulic system that require frequent exchange – such as hydraulic oil, hoses, and filters – are not present in the electric drive. Another major benefit of the electric crane is its superior environmental performance. Helping bulk carriers to decarbonise by enhancing energy efficiency, the technology also eliminates the risk of oil spills, which pose a slip hazard and a threat to marine life. Reduced noise and vibrations also minimise environmental impact and enhance operator comfort.
Similar benefits can be attained through electric deck machinery. With less need to include energy-reducing components than in hydraulic-electric systems, pure electric drives require a lower installed output and consume less fuel, achieving an efficiency rate of approximately 75–80%. For comparison, the efficiency rate of hydraulic-electric drives is typically around 50–60%. “As with electric cranes, electric deck machinery enables significant OpEx savings – especially when factoring in its reduced maintenance and spare parts requirements,” says Thomas Kappel, Senior MacGregor Executive, Deck Machinery. “It is also more compact and easier to install than hydraulic-electric systems, while the absence of hydraulic oil makes it safer for the crew and the environment.” In addition, reliability, performance, and operational availability are maximised – and unplanned downtime minimised – through the combination of tried-and-tested components and cutting-edge technology, he adds. “The reduced operating cost of electric deck machinery, as well as its superior technical reliability and safety, make it a smart investment for bulk carrier operators.” While some owners have expressed concerns about their crew’s ability to handle electric systems, Kappel explains that “we’ve observed the winch is relatively simple to operate, and it usually doesn’t require much time to train personnel in its usage”.
However, the true value of MacGregor’s electric cranes, deck machinery, and hatch covers is realised when the three systems are deployed in combination, says Mattias Gunnarsson, Vice President, Newbuilding. “With its superior efficiency, simplicity, and reliability, the cost-saving potential of the combined electric deck solution is huge, and the reduced power consumption enabled by all three components goes a long way to supporting regulatory compliance. Both factors are key to encouraging bulk carrier operators to adopt electric systems.” Gunnarsson points to the complete elimination of hydraulic oil as an additional benefit of the combined electric deck solution and adds that the best time to install electric systems is during vessel construction. “Installing all three electric deck solutions simultaneously is the most efficient approach, and by considering this at the ship design phase rather than for a retrofit project, owners minimise installation costs and downtime and maximise savings over the course of the vessel’s lifecycle.” Meanwhile, the reliability and performance of MacGregor’s electric deck solutions can be further enhanced through connection to OnWatch Scout, which enables advanced monitoring and analytics for optimised systems availability and maintenance planning. “For bulk carrier operators looking to reduce costs while enhancing environmental performance, reliability, and safety, MacGregor’s electric deck systems represent a simple, future-proof solution that comes with a multitude of benefits,” concludes Gunnarsson. Source: MacGregor
|
LMB-BML 2007 Webmaster & designer: Cmdt. André Jehaes - email andre.jehaes@lmb-bml.be
|
|
|
|